“Putting the Word Out: Blackstraction” (excerpt from performance 2000 – 2011)
Modernism
is defined as an art movement of the late 19th and early 20th
centuries characterized by deliberate departure from tradition and the use of
innovative forms of expression that distinguish many styles in the arts and
literature thereafter. Modernism refers to this period’s interest in:
-new types of paints and other
materials
-expressing feelings, ideas,
fantasies and dreams instead of reality
-creating abstractions instead
of representing what is real
-rejection of naturalistic color
-a use of choppy clearly visible
brushstrokes
-the acceptance of line, form, color
and process as valid subject matter
-the audience taking a more
active role as interpreter…
Modernism could be defined as the exposure and
influence of African and Oceanic tribal art on European artists. Considered
unrefined and unexplainable, this creative expression was beyond the realm of
recognized knowledge in the age of reason. It bought forth questions, what is [painting]?
What is [art]?
If
Malevich’s abstraction rid us of subject and Kandinsky gave us absolute
painting and modernism every style since, contemporary interrogation of
abstract painting will center on this same issue: what is painting? Its’ role
irrevocably altered and undefined after Modernism, two things happened:
painting without pigment was “born” while pigment painting became process and
subject.
Process painting
(abstraction) requires inducing the visual fundamentals of an artist’s
encounter with materials thru texture, form, shape, and color (methodology)
without reference to physical reality. Abstraction in [art] is a language of
our time, drawing on its’ ability to be molded and to self-modify based on
shared knowledge within a designated group. Without boundary between what is
real and what is imaginary, American artists explored “pure” aesthetics: what
is painting… what is abstraction… what is art…
Jackson
Pollock, influenced by Native American sand paintings, began pouring paint in
the 1940’s. In the late 50’s and early 60’s, Frank Stella raised paintings from
the wall and gave them shape while Robert Ryman concentrated on the act of
painting itself. Later in the 60’s Sam Gilliam went beyond painting draping the
Corcoran’s walls. In 1973, Al Loving began tearing his minimalist paintings in
strips and sewing them back together shaping the work as he went then
suspending the object “freestyle” when completed. Later, in the 70’s Gilliam
began to sculpt color while maintaining the basic integrity of painting.
Using
these and other 20th century methodologies, blackstractionists make
markings with pigment/color on diverse surfaces that relate to each other and
their environment in two and three dimensions to meld object, painting and
process… seemingly meaningless yet
significantly beautiful, enigmatic and as exotic as the tribal objects that
inspired Modernism… the ultimate thing of beauty, an objet d’art…
blackstraction (blak-strak’ sh-n) n.
a) the objectification of painting b) nonrepresentational drawings and paintings stressing formal internal relationships at times employing craft techniques and three dimensional presentation.
a) the objectification of painting b) nonrepresentational drawings and paintings stressing formal internal relationships at times employing craft techniques and three dimensional presentation.
V.t. the objectification of painting. blackstractionist n. an artist engaging therein…
blackstraction
(blak-strak’ sh-n) v.t.
to make markings with color on diverse
surfaces that relate to each other and their environment in two and three
dimensions blackstractioned, blackstractioning
Blackstractionism
(blak-strak’sh-niz-m) n. Fine Arts
a style of
emotive non-representational painting which appeared in the United States in
the late 20th century employing craft techniques and sometimes three
dimensional presentation b) theory and
practice of blackstraction
(pass the word on: Blackstraction!)
No comments:
Post a Comment